Daily Archives: September 4, 2013

Lake Huron nuclear waste dump questioned by officials

 

Ontario Power Generation plans to bury radioactive nuclear waste approximately 400 metres from Lake Huron. Scientists cannot guarantee that this Nuclear Waste Dump will not leak.The Great Lakes provide fresh drinking water for 40 million people in two countries.

By Jim Bloch, Voice Reporter, reposted from The Voice, Aug 30 2013

The St. Clair County Board of Commissioners recently passed a resolution questioning the wisdom of Ontario Power Generation’s plans to construct an underground depository for nuclear waste less than a mile from Lake Huron.

The board unanimously passed Resolution 13-18 on Aug. 15 when it convened at Cottrellville Township Hall as part of its three-stop summer road-show at townships in the county.

“This resolution is to support something passed by the state of Michigan,” said Jeff Bohm, chair of the board of commissioners, referring to Michigan Senate Resolution 58, passed unanimously on May 22 with 28 senators signing on as cosponsors, including Sen. Phil Pavlov, who represents St. Clair and Lapeer counties.

Bohm urged concerned residents to contact their U.S. Representatives and Senators, saying that the issue was federal in scope and would be dealt with on the federal level.

“As a county board, it’s a little out of our realm,” said Bohm.

Environmental critics of the deep geological repository have focused their appeals at city and county boards, state and provincial legislatures and both federal governments, following the axiom to “think globally, act locally.”

“This resolution uses similar language as the state of Michigan Senate Resolution 58, which does not outright oppose OPG’s proposed deep underground nuclear dump, but does raise serious concerns about its proximity to the Great Lakes, and quotes Michigan law that would prohibit such a dump in that location,” said Kay Cumbow, an anti-nuclear activist who advocated for the St. Clair County resolution. MORE

Fukushima radiation levels 18 times higher than previously thought

by reposted from The Guardian, Sept 1, 2013

Operator of Japanese nuclear power plant claims there has been no leak but has yet to discover cause of radiation spike

water tanks at the Fukushima nuclear power plant leak

A Tepco employee in protective clothing works around water tanks at the Fukushima nuclear power plant in June. Photograph: Noboru Hashimoto/EPA

Radiation levels 18 times higher than previously reported have been found near a water storage tank at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, causing fresh concern about the safety of the wrecked facility.

The plant’s operator, Tokyo Electric Power (Tepco), said radiation near the bottom of the tank measured 1,800 millisieverts an hour – high enough to kill an exposed person in four hours. Tepco said water levels inside the tank had not changed, indicating there had not been a leak. But the company said it had yet to discover the cause of the radiation spike.

Last month Tepco said another storage tank – of the same design as the container causing concern at the weekend – had leaked 300 tonnes of radioactive water, possibly into the sea.

Japan‘s nuclear watchdog confirmed last week it had raised the severity of that leak from level 1, an “anomaly”, to level 3, a “serious incident”, on an eight-point scale used by the International Atomic Energy Agency for radiological releases.

Earlier, the utility belatedly confirmed reports that a toxic mixture of groundwater and water being used to cool melted fuel lying deep inside the damaged reactors was seeping into the sea at a rate of about 300 tonnes a day. MORE

RELATED:

Errors Cast Doubt on Japan’s Cleanup of Nuclear Accident Site

Attempts to Control Contamination by Radioactivity in Fukushima

New Radiation Hotspots Found at Fukushima Daiichi

 

 

Preventing Ecocide: Mining Reform in Quebec

The Canadian Boreal Initiative calls on legislators to put an end to the precedence of mining rights and meet the province’s obligations to Aboriginal nations

MONTREAL, Sept. 3, 2013 /CNW/ - While recognizing improvements in the current Bill to amend Quebec’s Mining Act, the Canadian Boreal Initiative (CBI) regrets the absence of certain measures that have obtained consensus among many stakeholders after illuminating debate following the two previous reform efforts.

While the current Bill proposes tangible improvements, particularly with respect to environmental assessment requirements, information distribution, work plans, the exclusion of mining in urbanized areas and the restoration of mining sites, CBI nonetheless believes that maintaining the outdated system of open access is incompatible with the goals of Quebec’s Mineral Strategy, the Quebec Sustainable Development Act and Aboriginal law, including recent judgments, agreements, conventions and laws related to Aboriginal peoples.

“After two attempts at reform in as many legislative commissions, it is hard to understand the legislative amnesia and the continued absence of measures designed to both respect Aboriginal rights and titles, and abolish the outdated and unfair precedence given to mineral rights over protection of the environment and comprehensive land planning,” said Suzann Méthot, Quebec Regional Director for CBI.

By requiring companies to present preliminary work plans for mining activities, only minor changes to Bill 43 would be necessary to establish regulatory provisions allowing for consultation, accommodation and the consent of Aboriginal authorities and bring mining activities into compliance with various existing and future land use plans (municipal, regional, community, Aboriginal governments, provincial).

CBI recommends that the Commission:

  • Review and amend Bill 43 so that it truly meets the desire expressed by many stakeholders to reconcile mining development with the accommodation of Aboriginal rights, integrating in a collaborative approach a chapter on provisions specific to Aboriginal communities, taking into account Aboriginal interests, values, needs, rights and titles;
  • Promote best practices and industry investment security through an exploration permit system, putting an end to the obsolete and inappropriate precedence given to mining rights over other uses, in particular the creation of protected areas and conservation;
  • To ensure both environmental protection and economic predictability, incorporate mining activities into a larger strategy of comprehensive land planning, so as to allow for environmental protection before development. These activities would be subject to, and in compliance with, various land use plans and programs, current and future.

CBI is confident that such amendments can lead to the reduction of conflict, effective land planning and a better climate for responsible investment, which would benefit all Quebec citizens.

Last March CBI published a survey indicating that the majority of voters disagree with giving mining precedence over the rights of private landowners, Aboriginal communities and municipalities. A large proportion of Quebecers said that better protection of the environment, and the rights of people and communities, should be prioritized in the next reform.1

“Finally, I want to acknowledge, beside me today, Paul Wilkinson, Senior Vice-President, Environmental and Social Affairs, of New Millennium Iron Corp.,” noted Suzann Méthot. “As a company active in northeastern Quebec andLabrador, New Millennium wants to join CBI in exploring approaches and finding common solutions that can reconcile all rights, interests, needs and points of view with respect to the mining industry’s place in Quebec’s future - a demonstration that our concerns stem simply from good sense and are not indicative of dissension between industry and environmental groups.”

Canadian Boreal Initiative
The Canadian Boreal Initiative brings together diverse partners to create new solutions for the conservation and sustainable development of the Boreal forest. It works as a catalyst by supporting on-the-ground efforts, across the Boreal, by governments, industry, Aboriginal nations, conservation groups, major retailers, financial institutions and scientists.